Eating for results, without a diet

Guides · Nutrition

Most people who "eat for results" don't need a diet with a name, a rulebook, or a kitchen scale. They need a way to build meals that tends to leave them full, well-fuelled, and a little lighter in calories — without counting, weighing, or white-knuckling their way through the day. This guide is about that: the handful of durable, well-established habits that quietly do the work, and one simple half-plate method that pulls them all together.

Nothing here is a fad, a cleanse, or a promise. It's the boring, textbook stuff that keeps working: enough protein, plenty of plants, sensible portions, mostly whole foods, and water as your default drink. We'll go deep on each one, correct the myths that trip people up, and finish with a build-a-plate example you can use tonight. Where Strathlon already does some of this for you, we'll say so honestly — and where it's just good general practice, we'll say that too.

1. The whole guide in one plate

Here's the punchline first, because it's the single most useful thing on the page. Almost everything that follows collapses into one picture of a plate — and it's the same picture several national food guides already use. Health Canada (Canada) tells people to make half the plate vegetables and fruits, one quarter whole grain foods and one quarter protein foods, and to make water their drink of choice.^[1] Other countries draw it a little differently: the UK's Eatwell Guide puts fruit and vegetables at just over a third of what you eat across the day, with starchy foods taking a similar share.^[2] So treat the plate as a well-supported default, not a universal law. No weighing, no counting, no app required to eat a good meal:

A worked version, to make it concrete (illustrative, not a prescription):

Why this one picture works — the calorie and fullness payoff

The plate isn't arbitrary. Each part is pulling a specific, well-understood lever, and together they tend to produce a meal that is filling, muscle-supporting, well-fuelled, and lower in calories than it looks:

• The vegetable half brings a large volume of food for very few calories. In controlled trials, starting a meal with a large, low-energy-dense course — a big salad — increased fullness and cut the energy eaten across the whole meal by about 12%.^[3] Building meals around low-energy-dense foods lets people keep eating a satisfying amount of food while taking in fewer calories.^[4] You eat a big plate and still come in lighter. This is the energy-density trick, and it's the quiet engine of the whole method.
• The palm of protein is the macronutrient that most consistently raises ratings of fullness, calorie for calorie,^[5] and it supplies the amino acids that — paired with training — help protect muscle when you're eating a bit less.^[6]
• The fist of quality carbs is the key fuel for your brain and for higher-intensity work, and it tops up the glycogen your training runs on;^[6] its fibre adds to fullness. Enough fuel, not excess.
• The thumb of fat makes the meal satisfying and palatable — while the small portion keeps its dense calories in check.
• The water default sidesteps the liquid calories that appetite barely registers. When the same calories were added to the diet as a drink rather than as a solid food, people did not eat less to compensate, and body weight rose.^[7]

The net effect: the structure of the plate does the dieting for you. Results tend to come from how the plate is built, not from restriction, weighing, or willpower. And because the portions are your own hands, it scales to any body size automatically. The rest of this page simply explains each part in depth — but if you only take one thing away, take the plate.

2. Protein — the filling, muscle-protecting anchor

Protein supplies the amino acids your body uses to build and repair tissue, including muscle. Two of its properties make it the anchor of "eating for results."

It protects muscle. When you eat a little less than you burn, your body covers the gap partly from stored energy. You want that to be mostly body fat — but without enough protein and some resistance training, part of it can come from muscle. The joint position stand of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (United States), Dietitians of Canada (Canada) and the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM, United States) notes that when energy is restricted, higher protein intakes spread over the day may help prevent the loss of fat-free mass.^[6] Reviews of controlled feeding studies point the same way: higher-protein energy-restricted diets produced greater fat loss and better preservation of lean mass than lower-protein ones.^[8]

It's the most filling macronutrient — with a caveat. Calorie for calorie, protein raises how full people say they feel more reliably than carbs or fat: in one review of controlled trials, 11 of 14 studies found a protein pre-load significantly increased satiety ratings. Whether that translates into eating less at the next meal is less consistent — only 8 of 15 studies found a significant drop in subsequent intake.^[5] So a protein-forward meal is a good bet for feeling satisfied, but the weight-management payoff shows up across a whole diet rather than in any single meal.^[8]

How much — a range, not a magic number

General population reference intakes sit around 0.8 g/kg of body weight per day: the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA, European Union) sets a population reference intake of 0.83 g/kg per day for adults,^[9] a figure that matches a meta-analysis of 19 nitrogen-balance studies, which estimated an average requirement of 0.65 g/kg per day and a recommended allowance — the 97.5th percentile of individual requirements — of 0.83 g/kg of good-quality protein per day.^[10] That's a level designed to meet almost everyone's basic needs, not an optimum for an active person. For people who train, the joint position stand of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Dietitians of Canada and the ACSM puts the daily requirement at 1.2–2.0 g/kg per day, with higher intakes indicated during intensified training or when energy intake is reduced.^[6] For weight loss specifically, a review of higher-protein diets concluded that 1.2–1.6 g/kg per day, with roughly 25–30 g of protein per meal, improved appetite and body-weight outcomes compared with lower-protein diets.^[8] Treat these as ranges: the right figure shifts with your size, training, age and goals. Most casual exercisers eating a normal mixed diet land near the bottom of this range without trying, so deliberately aiming a little higher is usually where the win is.

How to actually hit it — no counting

Put a protein source in every meal, and often in snacks. That single habit raises your daily total naturally. Easy anchors:

• Animal and dairy: eggs, Greek yogurt, cottage cheese, milk, fish, poultry, lean meat.
• Plant: tofu, tempeh, edamame, beans, lentils, chickpeas, and soy or pea protein powders.

On the plate, this is simply the palm of protein per meal. No math.

3. Fibre — fullness you barely notice

Fibre is plant carbohydrate your body doesn't digest for energy, and it earns its place through several routes at once:

• Fullness: soluble fibre delays gastric emptying and increases the viscosity of stomach contents, which promotes satiety.^[13]
• Regularity: insoluble fibre increases faecal bulk and reduces intestinal transit time.^[13]
• Gut and metabolic health: gut bacteria ferment fibre into short-chain fatty acids,^[13] and in a large series of meta-analyses, the people eating the most fibre had roughly 15–30% lower all-cause and cardiovascular mortality than those eating the least.^[14]

Targets differ by country, which is worth knowing before you chase a single magic number. The US adequate intake is 14 g per 1,000 kcal — about 25 g/day for adult women and 38 g/day for adult men;^[15] EFSA (European Union) sets 25 g/day for adults;^[9] and UK government guidance is 30 g/day.^[16] The pooled evidence suggests most of the benefit arrives somewhere in the 25–29 g/day band, with more still helping.^[14] Almost nobody gets there: US mean intake is about 17 g/day, with only 5% of people meeting the adequate intake,^[15] and UK adults average around 20 g/day.^[16] Fibre is one of the easiest wins available.

Getting there is mostly about food choice, not supplements: vegetables, fruit (with edible skins on), beans and lentils, whole grains, nuts and seeds. Two practical cautions worth stating plainly: increase fibre gradually — clinical guidance suggests adding just 2–3 g every few days — and drink enough water as you do, since fluid is what helps the extra fibre move through comfortably.^[13]

4. Carbs as fuel, not the enemy

Carbohydrate is your body's readily available fuel, stored as glycogen in muscle and liver. It is a key fuel for the brain and central nervous system, it is the main substrate for high-intensity efforts lasting seconds to a couple of minutes, and running those stores down is associated with fatigue, impaired skill and a higher perception of effort.^[6] The useful distinction is quality and context, not carbs-as-a-category: fibre-rich, minimally processed carbs — whole grains, fruit, legumes, starchy vegetables — arrive with fibre and micronutrients, and the ones that also bring water and bulk pull the meal's calories per gram down, which is the same energy-density lever again.^[4]

On the plate, that's a fist of quality carbs per meal for most people, with a bit more around demanding training. Choose whole-food carbs most of the time and let activity size the portion.

5. Whole foods — the easier default

"Whole" or minimally processed foods — vegetables, fruit, legumes, whole grains, eggs, dairy, fish, meat, nuts — tend to arrive with their natural package intact: fibre, water, protein and micronutrients, and generally lower energy density and higher fullness per calorie.^[4] The effect of the other end of the spectrum is not just an association: in an inpatient randomised crossover trial, the same 20 adults ate about 500 kcal a day more on an ultra-processed diet than on an unprocessed one, and gained about 0.9 kg — even though the two diets were matched for presented calories, sugar, fat, sodium, fibre and macronutrients.^[18] Separately, an umbrella review of 45 pooled meta-analyses links higher ultra-processed food intake to a range of poorer health outcomes — but the underlying studies are observational and most of that evidence was graded low or very low certainty, so it is an association, not proof of a single mechanism for every product.^[19]

The practical target is mostly whole foods, most of the time. It's a dial, not an on/off switch. No food is banned, and rigid "clean eating" isn't the goal.

6. Portions without weighing

Portion size strongly influences how much you eat: a Cochrane review of 72 randomised trials found that people consistently consume more food and drink when offered larger portions, packages or tableware than when offered smaller ones.^[20] But scales and calorie counting are impractical for most people to sustain for years. Hand-based portions are a decent compromise: they scale to your body size (bigger person, bigger hands, bigger needs) and they travel anywhere. Be honest about how accurate they are, though. In one validation study — 67 adults estimating 42 pre-weighed foods and drinks — accuracy depended almost entirely on the technique and the food. Using finger widths as a ruler to measure foods with a regular geometric shape, 80% of estimates landed within ±25% of the true weight, against 29% for cups and spoons. But the fist cue, used on amorphous foods — rice, cereal flakes, mashed potato and muffins — did badly: only one of those eight portions came within 25% of its true weight, and the authors conclude that portion estimates for such foods, by hand or by household measure, "should be interpreted with caution".^[21] So use the cues below to keep portions in a sensible range, not as measurement:

• Protein: a palm (the size and thickness of your palm) per meal.
• Carbs: a cupped hand or fist per meal.
• Vegetables: a fist or two — and more is generally fine.
• Fats (oils, nuts, cheese, nut butters): a thumb — these are energy-dense, so a little goes a long way.

That's the same hand guide that builds the plate — which is the point. One set of cues, and you can portion any meal, in any kitchen, at any restaurant.

7. Vegetable volume for fullness

This is the energy-density lever, and it's the mechanism doing the heavy lifting in the whole method. Most non-starchy vegetables are largely water and fibre, so they carry very few calories per gram — which means you can eat a large, genuinely satisfying volume of food for very few calories. Build meals around low-energy-dense foods and people keep eating a satisfying amount while their calorie total falls; in trials, that approach outperformed cutting fat and shrinking portions as a weight-loss strategy.^[4]

In practice: make non-starchy vegetables the biggest thing on the plate. Bulk out meals you already eat — extra veg in a pasta sauce, a big side salad, vegetables piled into stir-fries and stews. A salad before a meal uses the same effect: in a randomised crossover study, a large low-energy-dense first-course salad cut total lunch calories by about 12% compared with no starter.^[3]

8. Meal timing — mostly overrated

For most people, total daily intake and food quality matter far more than the clock. Timing has a few genuinely useful, modest levers. Spreading protein across the day beats loading it into the evening: when the same daily protein was eaten evenly across three meals rather than skewed towards dinner, 24-hour muscle protein synthesis was 25% higher.^[22] Eating around training supports performance and recovery, and position stands recommend meeting daily protein goals with a regular spread across the day and after hard sessions.^[6] And a regular meal pattern helps many people manage hunger and avoid arriving ravenous and overshooting later. Approaches like time-restricted eating can help some people, but they carry no unique metabolic magic: in a 12-month randomised trial, adding an eight-hour eating window to calorie restriction produced no greater reduction in body weight, body fat or metabolic risk factors than calorie restriction alone.^[23]

The practical version: find a regular pattern you can keep, get protein at each main meal, and don't show up to meals so hungry that you overshoot. If a particular eating window fits your life, it's a valid tool — not a rule everyone must follow.

9. Hydration

Water supports nearly every bodily process — temperature regulation, circulation, digestion and physical performance. Fluid deficits greater than about 2% of body weight can compromise cognitive function and aerobic exercise performance, particularly in hot weather;^[6] adequate fluid also helps fibre do its job comfortably.^[13] Needs vary widely with body size, climate, sweat rate and activity, so precise universal targets don't really hold up.

The simple approach: drink to thirst and keep water within reach. For most healthy people, pale-coloured urine is a practical everyday indicator you're in a good range — it's the cue position stands use for pre-exercise hydration.^[6] Drink more around exercise and in the heat, and make water — and largely unsweetened drinks — your default.

10. Liquid calories

Calories from drinks — sugary soft drinks, juices, sweetened coffees, alcohol, large smoothies — tend to be poorly registered by appetite. Matched for calories and macronutrients, a beverage produced the weakest appetite response and a solid food the strongest, with semi-solids in between.^[26] Over four weeks, adding 450 kcal/day as a soft drink produced no compensating reduction elsewhere and body weight rose, while the same calories as sweets were almost exactly compensated for.^[7] That makes liquid calories one of the easiest, lowest-friction places to overshoot. Alcohol behaves the same way and then some: a meta-analysis found that drinking alcohol significantly increased both food energy intake and total energy intake compared with a non-alcoholic drink — adults simply don't eat less to make room for it.^[27]

Make water, unsweetened tea and coffee, and other no- or low-calorie drinks your default. Treat sugary drinks and alcohol as occasional, and remember that "healthy" liquids — big smoothies, juices, milky coffee drinks — still carry real calories. Be realistic about the size of the win, though: in a six-month randomised trial, adults asked to replace caloric drinks with water or with diet drinks lost about 2–2.5% of body weight, which was not significantly more than a control group given general healthy-habits advice.^[28] It's a simple, low-effort swap rather than a magic one — which is why the plate pairs food with a water default instead of relying on drinks alone to do the work.

11. A word on supplements

Supplements are optional extras, not essentials. Food first. With that framing, and being straight about the evidence:

• Reasonable evidence, in the right context: protein powder (a convenient way to hit a protein target, not magic — the muscle benefit comes from reaching the total, and it stops adding to fat-free mass above about 1.6 g/kg per day^[12]); creatine monohydrate, which the International Society of Sports Nutrition (ISSN, United States) calls the most effective ergogenic nutritional supplement available for high-intensity exercise capacity and lean body mass — noting that several of that position stand's authors declare commercial ties to the supplement industry;^[31] vitamin D, where the advice is broader than "only if deficient" — the NHS (United Kingdom) advises that everyone consider a 10 microgram daily supplement in autumn and winter, and all year round for people who are seldom outdoors or keep their skin covered;^[32] and specific supplements a clinician recommends for a diagnosed deficiency — for example B12 for some vegans, or iron for diagnosed low iron.
• Weak, mixed, or no good evidence for most people: most "fat-burner," "metabolism-boosting," "detox" and testosterone-boosting products, and the majority of exotic single ingredients marketed for weight loss.

A few honest caveats: the rules on what supplements may contain and claim differ from country to country, "natural" doesn't mean proven or safe, and no supplement out-works an otherwise poor diet. If you have a condition or take medication, check for interactions with a professional before adding anything.

12. Takeaways, and how Strathlon helps

• Build the plate, don't build a diet. Half vegetables, a palm of protein, a fist of quality carbs, a thumb of fat, water to drink. The structure produces a filling, well-fuelled, lower-calorie meal on its own.
• Anchor every meal with protein. One clear protein source per meal raises your daily total naturally and keeps you fuller. In Strathlon, your nutrition targets already include a personalised protein goal, so the "palm of protein" cue has a number behind it when you want one.
• Let vegetables do the volume. The biggest, cheapest win for fullness-per-calorie. Make them the largest thing on the plate.
• Treat carbs as fuel and choose whole foods most of the time. Enough to train well, quality more often than not — no need to fear or cut a whole macronutrient.
• Default to water; watch liquid calories. The easiest swap with a real payoff.
• Don't over-think timing. The day as a whole matters far more than the clock. If you're curious how your intake and output net out over time, that's what your energy balance is for.

Where it's honest to say so: Strathlon already turns much of this into numbers you can glance at — personalised protein, fibre and fat targets in the Tracker, and an energy-balance view that shows the bigger picture over days and weeks, not one meal. But the plate method needs none of that. It works at any table, for any body size, with nothing but your own two hands. The app is there to confirm and fine-tune what the plate is already doing for you — not to replace it.

References

Every figure in this guide comes from the sources below. Where a number reflects official guidance rather than a single trial, the citation is to the body that issued it, with its country named — national guidance differs, and no one country's advice is the last word. Where a source has industry funding or commercial ties, that is stated in the entry.

1. Health Canada (Canada). Canada's food guide — "Make healthy meals with Canada's food guide plate" (plate proportions; page last modified 20 May 2026) and "Food guide snapshot" (make water your drink of choice). Accessed July 2026. canada.ca — food guide plate
2. National Health Service (NHS, United Kingdom). The Eatwell Guide — the UK government's healthy-eating model, including fluid advice. nhs.uk/live-well/eat-well/food-guidelines-and-food-labels/the-eatwell-guide
3. Rolls BJ, Roe LS, Meengs JS. Salad and satiety: energy density and portion size of a first-course salad affect energy intake at lunch. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2004;104(10):1570–1576. PubMed 15389416
4. Ello-Martin JA, Ledikwe JH, Rolls BJ. The influence of food portion size and energy density on energy intake: implications for weight management. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2005;82(1 Suppl):236S–241S. PubMed 16002828
5. Halton TL, Hu FB. The effects of high protein diets on thermogenesis, satiety and weight loss: a critical review. Journal of the American College of Nutrition. 2004;23(5):373–385. Structured abstract via the NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (United Kingdom). NCBI Bookshelf NBK70804
6. Thomas DT, Erdman KA, Burke LM. American College of Sports Medicine Joint Position Statement. Nutrition and Athletic Performance. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2016;48(3):543–568. Issued jointly by the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (United States), Dietitians of Canada (Canada) and the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM, United States). PubMed 26891166
7. DiMeglio DP, Mattes RD. Liquid versus solid carbohydrate: effects on food intake and body weight. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders. 2000;24(6):794–800. PubMed 10878689
8. Leidy HJ, Clifton PM, Astrup A, Wycherley TP, Westerterp-Plantenga MS, Luscombe-Marsh ND, Woods SC, Mattes RD. The role of protein in weight loss and maintenance. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2015;101(6):1320S–1329S. Industry funding disclosed: this supplement arose from Protein Summit 2.0, funded by The Beef Checkoff, Dairy Research Institute, Egg Nutrition Center, Global Dairy Platform, Hillshire Brands and the National Pork Board (all United States). PubMed 25926512
9. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA, European Union). Dietary reference values for nutrients: summary report — summary tables, version 4, September 2017 (protein, dietary fibre and water). efsa.europa.eu (PDF)
10. Rand WM, Pellett PL, Young VR. Meta-analysis of nitrogen balance studies for estimating protein requirements in healthy adults. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2003;77(1):109–127. PubMed 12499330
11. Devries MC, Sithamparapillai A, Brimble KS, Banfield L, Morton RW, Phillips SM. Changes in kidney function do not differ between healthy adults consuming higher- compared with lower- or normal-protein diets: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Nutrition. 2018;148(11):1760–1775. PubMed 30383278
12. Morton RW, Murphy KT, McKellar SR, et al. A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of the effect of protein supplementation on resistance training-induced gains in muscle mass and strength in healthy adults. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2018;52(6):376–384. PMC5867436
13. Daley SF, Shreenath AP. The role of dietary fiber in health promotion and disease prevention: a practical guide for clinicians. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; updated 2025. NCBI Bookshelf NBK559033
14. Reynolds A, Mann J, Cummings J, Winter N, Mete E, Te Morenga L. Carbohydrate quality and human health: a series of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The Lancet. 2019;393(10170):434–445. Funders included the World Health Organization (international) and the Health Research Council of New Zealand. PubMed 30638909
15. Dahl WJ, Stewart ML. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: health implications of dietary fiber. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2015;115(11):1861–1870. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (United States). PubMed 26514720
16. National Health Service (NHS, United Kingdom). How to get more fibre into your diet — stating the 30 g/day government recommendation and current average intake. nhs.uk/live-well/eat-well/digestive-health/how-to-get-more-fibre-into-your-diet
17. Gardner CD, Trepanowski JF, Del Gobbo LC, et al. Effect of low-fat vs low-carbohydrate diet on 12-month weight loss in overweight adults and the association with genotype pattern or insulin secretion: the DIETFITS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319(7):667–679. PubMed 29466592
18. Hall KD, Ayuketah A, Brychta R, et al. Ultra-processed diets cause excess calorie intake and weight gain: an inpatient randomized controlled trial of ad libitum food intake. Cell Metabolism. 2019;30(1):67–77.e3. PubMed 31105044
19. Lane MM, Gamage E, Du S, et al. Ultra-processed food exposure and adverse health outcomes: umbrella review of epidemiological meta-analyses. BMJ. 2024;384:e077310. PubMed 38418082
20. Hollands GJ, Shemilt I, Marteau TM, Jebb SA, Lewis HB, Wei Y, Higgins JPT, Ogilvie D. Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015;(9):CD011045. PubMed 26368271
21. Gibson AA, Hsu MSH, Rangan AM, et al. Accuracy of hands v. household measures as portion size estimation aids. Journal of Nutritional Science. 2016;5:e29. Single validation study, 67 adults, 42 pre-weighed foods and liquids. PMC4976119
22. Mamerow MM, Mettler JA, English KL, Casperson SL, Arentson-Lantz E, Sheffield-Moore M, Layman DK, Paddon-Jones D. Dietary protein distribution positively influences 24-h muscle protein synthesis in healthy adults. The Journal of Nutrition. 2014;144(6):876–880. PubMed 24477298
23. Liu D, Huang Y, Huang C, et al. Calorie restriction with or without time-restricted eating in weight loss. New England Journal of Medicine. 2022;386(16):1495–1504. PubMed 35443107
24. Bellisle F, McDevitt R, Prentice AM. Meal frequency and energy balance. British Journal of Nutrition. 1997;77(Suppl 1):S57–S70. PubMed 9155494
25. Brown CM, Dulloo AG, Montani JP. Water-induced thermogenesis reconsidered: the effects of osmolality and water temperature on energy expenditure after drinking. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2006;91(9):3598–3602. PubMed 16822824
26. Mattes RD, Campbell WW. Effects of food form and timing of ingestion on appetite and energy intake in lean young adults and in young adults with obesity. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2009;109(3):430–437. PMC2680008
27. Kwok A, Dordevic AL, Paton G, Page MJ, Truby H. Effect of alcohol consumption on food energy intake: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Nutrition. 2019;121(5):481–495. PubMed 30630543
28. Tate DF, Turner-McGrievy G, Lyons E, et al. Replacing caloric beverages with water or diet beverages for weight loss in adults: main results of the Choose Healthy Options Consciously Everyday (CHOICE) randomized clinical trial. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2012;95(3):555–563. PMC3632875
29. Flood-Obbagy JE, Rolls BJ. The effect of fruit in different forms on energy intake and satiety at a meal. Appetite. 2009;52(2):416–422. PMC2664987
30. World Health Organization (WHO, international). Use of non-sugar sweeteners: WHO guideline. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023. NCBI Bookshelf NBK592245
31. Kreider RB, Kalman DS, Antonio J, et al. International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: safety and efficacy of creatine supplementation in exercise, sport, and medicine. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition. 2017;14:18. International Society of Sports Nutrition (ISSN, United States). Commercial ties disclosed: the manuscript was supported by the Council for Responsible Nutrition (a United States supplement-industry trade association) and several authors declare supplement-industry funding, consultancies or ownership interests. PMC5469049
32. National Health Service (NHS, United Kingdom). Vitamin D — vitamins and minerals guidance, reflecting advice from the Department of Health and Social Care. nhs.uk/conditions/vitamins-and-minerals/vitamin-d

This is general educational information, not medical or dietetic advice. Individual variation is large, and figures such as the protein (0.83 / 1.2–2.0 g/kg), fibre (25–38 g/day, depending on the country setting the target) and hand-portion guides above are approximate, evidence-based estimates rather than exact prescriptions. Anyone with a health condition — including diabetes, kidney disease, a GI condition, or a history of disordered eating — anyone who is pregnant, and anyone on medication should consult a qualified physician or registered dietitian before making significant changes to how they eat. See our Terms for more.

← All guides · Protein and muscle · Energy balance · Understanding your stats · User guide · Home